07/11/SH NEWS

Upgradation of Grade Pay of LDC/UDC: Date of next hearing is 01/04/2020.

Flash message

Monday, July 30, 2018

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL 
HIERARCHY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21803/2014

The case is with Registrar Court. Next date of hearing is  05/09/2018

31 comments:

  1. Supreme Court of India is testing the petience of government servants. One way SC says no stay beyond 6 months and it is taking 4 years and not settled the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. tarikh pe tarikh akhir kab tak,

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is to late all government servant are eagerly waiting MACP ON PROMOTIONAL from last 4 years. i request Modi government to rectifie the matter for the betterment of govt servant

    ReplyDelete
  4. Justice Chalameshwar was part of the bench. After his retirement new judge has to be put in 3 the judge bench. CJI Deepak Mishra is not putting third judge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017
    Respondent nos. 1 to 13, 15,17,18,20 to 23, 26 and 27
    have failed to file counter affidavit despite last
    opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity
    is declined.
    Service is complete on respondent no.6 but vakalatnama
    has not been filed. Be filed.
    Await orders of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers in respect of
    respondent no.36.
    Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps
    for effecting service on respondent nos.14,16 and 19, as
    such, registry to process the matter as per rules for
    listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate
    orders.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A
    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
    BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA
    Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21803/2014
    UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY & ORS. Petitioner(s)
    VERSUS
    M.V. MOHANAN NAIR Respondent(s)
    (Only SLP (C) Nos. 35001, 32992 of 2016, 16839-73 of 2017, 21875 of
    2017, 20069-20071/2017, 27058-70/2016, 20058-102/2016 and 2163-2165
    of 2018 is to listed before the is to be listed before the Court of
    Ld. Registrar on 30.07.2018.
    )
    WITH
    SLP(C) No. 32992/2016 (XV)
    (matter to be listed before three Judges Bench.)
    SLP(C) No. 35001/2016 (XV)
    (matter to be listed before three Judges Bench.)
    SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017 (IV-A)
    SLP(C) No. 2163-2165/2018 (XI-A)
    Date : 30-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
    For Petitioner(s)
    Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR
    Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR
    Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
    Mr Om Prakash, Adv.
    Mr Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Adv.
    Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

    For Respondent(s)
    Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
    Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR
    Mr. A. N. Arora, AOR
    Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, AOR
    Mr Jishnu M.L., Adv.
    Mrs Priyanka Prakash, Adv.
    Mrs Beena Prakash, Adv.
    Mr. G. Prakash, AOR
    Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR
    -2-
    Item No.19
    Mr. Naveen R. Nath, AOR
    Mr. Prashant Kumar, AOR
    Mr Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv.
    Mr Naresh Kumar Gaur, Adv.
    Ms. Punam Kumari, AOR
    Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR
    Ms Ipsita Behura, Adv.
    Ms. Sumita Hazarika, AOR
    Mr M Chandra Sekhar, Adv.
    Mr V Sudeer, Adv.
    Mr M.B.Ramasubba Raju, Adv.
    Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR
    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
    O R D E R
    SLP(C) No. 32992/2016, SLP(C) No. 35001/2016
    Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps
    for effecting service on respondent no.2, as such, registry
    to process the matter as per rules for listing before the
    Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders.
    SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017
    Respondent nos. 1 to 13, 15,17,18,20 to 23, 26 and 27
    have failed to file counter affidavit despite last
    opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity
    is declined.
    Service is complete on respondent no.6 but vakalatnama
    has not been filed. Be filed.
    Await orders of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers in respect of
    respondent no.36.
    Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps
    for effecting service on respondent nos.14,16 and 19, as
    such, registry to process the matter as per rules for
    listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate
    orders.
    -3-
    Item no.19
    SLP(C) No. 2163-2165/2018
    Respondent nos. 1 to 25 and 27 to 42 have filed counter
    affidavit.
    Respondent no.26(i) is granted four weeks time for
    filing counter affidavit.
    List again on 5.9.2018.
    KAPIL MEHTA
    Registrar
    30.07.2018
    hj

    ReplyDelete
  7. इन लोगों को केस नहीं करना चाहिए था । जो समय का महत्व नहीं समझते हैं । इनकी वजह से कहीं केस हार न जाए ।

    ReplyDelete
  8. Prime Minister Office me complaint likhana chahiye. 6 months me reply aata hai.
    stagnant post ke liye MACP on promotioanl hierarchy is must.

    ReplyDelete
  9. SC can hear petition for yakoob menon in mid night but not for common man /Govt. servant because their grievance/dissent will not affect pressure cooker burst.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Executive is interfering in the functions of SC. At the instance of executive the SC is deferring the case indefinitely.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Any update, whether the case was taken up today or the same old story....

    ReplyDelete
  12. the case is listed for hearing on 11.10.2018 as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Is there any official post from the association

    ReplyDelete
  14. Any interim statement/order made by SC on September 5, 2018 or just pushing the date ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Cut-up date as 30.8.2008 should be waved by which sufferers will be benifitted to get ACP on promotional heirarchy,as allowed to prior emplyees .option should be allowed ,

    ReplyDelete
  16. When there is clear cut instruction in ACP and was given hierarchy pay scale which was provided before implimating MACP. Now there is only change in name why supreme court is hesitating to give verdicts. How many peoples curse will take to give the verdict. Present President and Prime Minister's instead of foreign trip please take personal intervention, otherwise peoples will loose their trust on judicial.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Next date of hearing is 11.10.2018. But it is doubtfull as to whether it will be heard. Because the matter is now on "Tarikh pe Tarikh" mode.

    ReplyDelete
  18. What happened today,Kindly update

    ReplyDelete
  19. any update on 11th oct case?

    ReplyDelete
  20. was the case heard or 11/10/18 ...... or the same old story..... shaji. d. tvm

    ReplyDelete
  21. What is the status of the case, can any one able to update

    ReplyDelete
  22. kindly update the status of macp case scheduled to be heard on 11-10-2018

    ReplyDelete
  23. The case is listed for hearing on 13.11.2018.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Any update on hearing on 13.11.2018.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Any updates on todays (i.e. 16/01/2019) hearing

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think the 7th pay commission recommend uniform scale for both CSS service and attached/subordinate services. However, the govt. continue to give step-motherly treatment for the attached/subordinate service employees'. Now, the supreme court reluctant to give their judgement on promotion hierarchy. It is beyond my reach, Whether the govt. role is there in this case. Various High Court has given their verdict that MACP should be on promotion hierarchy. What is the next date of hearing.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Next date of hearing is 01.03.19.

    ReplyDelete