MINISTRY OF STATISTICS & PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Supreme Court of India is testing the petience of government servants. One way SC says no stay beyond 6 months and it is taking 4 years and not settled the issue.
You exactly right now
tarikh pe tarikh akhir kab tak,
It is to late all government servant are eagerly waiting MACP ON PROMOTIONAL from last 4 years. i request Modi government to rectifie the matter for the betterment of govt servant
Wait frinds ACHHE DIN AAYEGE
Justice Chalameshwar was part of the bench. After his retirement new judge has to be put in 3 the judge bench. CJI Deepak Mishra is not putting third judge.
SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017Respondent nos. 1 to 13, 15,17,18,20 to 23, 26 and 27have failed to file counter affidavit despite lastopportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunityis declined.Service is complete on respondent no.6 but vakalatnamahas not been filed. Be filed.Await orders of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers in respect ofrespondent no.36.Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh stepsfor effecting service on respondent nos.14,16 and 19, assuch, registry to process the matter as per rules forlisting before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriateorders.
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21803/2014UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSM.V. MOHANAN NAIR Respondent(s)(Only SLP (C) Nos. 35001, 32992 of 2016, 16839-73 of 2017, 21875 of2017, 20069-20071/2017, 27058-70/2016, 20058-102/2016 and 2163-2165of 2018 is to listed before the is to be listed before the Court ofLd. Registrar on 30.07.2018.)WITHSLP(C) No. 32992/2016 (XV)(matter to be listed before three Judges Bench.) SLP(C) No. 35001/2016 (XV)(matter to be listed before three Judges Bench.) SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017 (IV-A) SLP(C) No. 2163-2165/2018 (XI-A)Date : 30-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AORMr Om Prakash, Adv.Mr Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. A. N. Arora, AOR Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, AORMr Jishnu M.L., Adv.Mrs Priyanka Prakash, Adv.Mrs Beena Prakash, Adv. Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR-2-Item No.19 Mr. Naveen R. Nath, AOR Mr. Prashant Kumar, AORMr Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv.Mr Naresh Kumar Gaur, Adv. Ms. Punam Kumari, AOR Mr. K. Rajeev, AORMs Ipsita Behura, Adv. Ms. Sumita Hazarika, AORMr M Chandra Sekhar, Adv.Mr V Sudeer, Adv.Mr M.B.Ramasubba Raju, Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSLP(C) No. 32992/2016, SLP(C) No. 35001/2016Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh stepsfor effecting service on respondent no.2, as such, registryto process the matter as per rules for listing before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders.SLP(C) No. 16839-16873/2017Respondent nos. 1 to 13, 15,17,18,20 to 23, 26 and 27have failed to file counter affidavit despite lastopportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunityis declined.Service is complete on respondent no.6 but vakalatnamahas not been filed. Be filed.Await orders of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers in respect ofrespondent no.36.Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh stepsfor effecting service on respondent nos.14,16 and 19, assuch, registry to process the matter as per rules forlisting before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriateorders.-3-Item no.19SLP(C) No. 2163-2165/2018Respondent nos. 1 to 25 and 27 to 42 have filed counteraffidavit.Respondent no.26(i) is granted four weeks time forfiling counter affidavit.List again on 5.9.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 30.07.2018hj
इन लोगों को केस नहीं करना चाहिए था । जो समय का महत्व नहीं समझते हैं । इनकी वजह से कहीं केस हार न जाए ।
Prime Minister Office me complaint likhana chahiye. 6 months me reply aata hai.stagnant post ke liye MACP on promotioanl hierarchy is must.
SC can hear petition for yakoob menon in mid night but not for common man /Govt. servant because their grievance/dissent will not affect pressure cooker burst.
Executive is interfering in the functions of SC. At the instance of executive the SC is deferring the case indefinitely.
Any update, whether the case was taken up today or the same old story....
the case is listed for hearing on 11.10.2018 as usual.
Is there any official post from the association
Any interim statement/order made by SC on September 5, 2018 or just pushing the date ?
Cut-up date as 30.8.2008 should be waved by which sufferers will be benifitted to get ACP on promotional heirarchy,as allowed to prior emplyees .option should be allowed ,
When there is clear cut instruction in ACP and was given hierarchy pay scale which was provided before implimating MACP. Now there is only change in name why supreme court is hesitating to give verdicts. How many peoples curse will take to give the verdict. Present President and Prime Minister's instead of foreign trip please take personal intervention, otherwise peoples will loose their trust on judicial.
Next date of hearing is 11.10.2018. But it is doubtfull as to whether it will be heard. Because the matter is now on "Tarikh pe Tarikh" mode.
What happened today,Kindly update
any update on 11th oct case?
was the case heard or 11/10/18 ...... or the same old story..... shaji. d. tvm
What is the status of the case, can any one able to update
kindly update the status of macp case scheduled to be heard on 11-10-2018
The case is listed for hearing on 13.11.2018.
Any update on hearing on 13.11.2018.
Next date is 16.01.19
Any updates on todays (i.e. 16/01/2019) hearing
I think the 7th pay commission recommend uniform scale for both CSS service and attached/subordinate services. However, the govt. continue to give step-motherly treatment for the attached/subordinate service employees'. Now, the supreme court reluctant to give their judgement on promotion hierarchy. It is beyond my reach, Whether the govt. role is there in this case. Various High Court has given their verdict that MACP should be on promotion hierarchy. What is the next date of hearing.
Next date of hearing is 01.03.19.