07/11/SH NEWS

Upgradation of Grade Pay of LDC/UDC: Date of next hearing is 01/04/2020.

Flash message

Friday, February 12, 2016

THE CASE IS LIKELY TO BE LISTED ON 29/02/2016

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL 
HIERARCHY
SLP(C) NO. 21803/2014 (UNION OF INDIA & ORS VS.  M.V. MOHANAN NAIR) TAGGED WITH CASE NUMBERS SLP(C) NO. 22181/2014 , SLP(C) NO. 23335/2014, SLP(C) NO. 23333/2014, SLP(C) NO. 18227/2015

Case Details
STATUS PENDING

Special Leave Petition (Civil)   21803 / 2014
Petitioner                                                   UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
                                                                     Vs.
Respondent                                              M.V. MOHANAN NAIR
Advocate(Petitioner)                               MR. B. V. BALARAM DAS
Advocate(Respondent)                          MR. C. K. SASI
Appealed Against                                     High Court Details - Not Available
Matter is Connected To                          Connected Details - Not Available
Subject Matter                                           MATTERS RELATING TO JUDICIARY MATTERS PERTAINING TO    EMPLOYEESOF DISTRICT COURTS  AND TRIBUNALS
Listing Details                                       Likely to be Listed on - 29/02/2016
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Saturday, February 13, 2016 - 11:35:19 AM
Posted by at

16 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2016 at 12:33 AM

    Shri Pillai Ji, why this confusion? Why the dates are frequently changing. Any how it is good news that the matter will be heard in this month only. It is requested that MOS's reply to parliamentary question may be brought to the notice of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hope for the best...

    ReplyDelete
  2. RSFebruary 13, 2016 at 12:38 AM

    The case may please be defended in such a way that all the ldcs n udcs could get sure benefit of this case. Please reiterate the fact of reply given by most in Parliament and bring the matter to the notice of SC how the govt is cheating the lower rung cadres

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SENVIJIFebruary 15, 2016 at 10:09 PM

      Rightly said RS The SC might have preponed the hearing since the MoS reply to the parliament indirectly directs all the affected persons to file cases in various courts/forums. Lets us hope for a positive judgement on 29.02.2016.

      Delete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 14, 2016 at 5:36 AM

    The MOS's reply in parliament question regarding MACP in promotional hierarchy give a positive direction to the case so kindly attached the same with case. Only due to this the case being prepended.

    ReplyDelete
  4. SENVIJIFebruary 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM

    Supreme Court bench is in total chaos and confusion in deciding the case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFebruary 14, 2016 at 10:13 PM

    Hope for best. Supreme court is also in favour of employees only. Otherwise each and every employee has to go to court and trouble the judges so that the cases will increase more and more. The MOS reply is not satisfactorily. As per his remark each individual go and fight for his right then only they will get justice. This is the blunder reply given by MOS

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownFebruary 15, 2016 at 12:28 AM

    Sir, I am appt on 14 sep 2004 and on the same day other pers appt as schedule caste.He was promoted as UDC wef 01 Dec 2013 and gtd Grade Pay Rs 2400/-. However, MACP gtd to me wef 14 Sep 2014 with the Grade Pay Rs 2000/-. Sir, its right not gave status/promotion to me but Grade Pay must be Rs 2400/-for alive a normal life. My mail id is ravinderkumar_27@yahoo.in

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousFebruary 15, 2016 at 6:34 AM

      Dont be disappointed Mr.Ravinder Kumar. Promotion has nothing to do with financial upgradation under MACP Scheme. A UDC gets Grade pay of Rs.2400/- on his promotion whereas in MACP a LDC gets Grade pay of Rs.2000/- on completion of ten years of regular service under the existing MACP guidelines and you should not compare yourself with a promotee. As per existing Scheme, you have rightly been granted Grade pay of Rs.2000/- which of course is not a huge financial benefit. One must get atleast Rs.1000/- on grant of financial upgradation so that after ten years of service, if one does not get any promotion, he can be compensated to some extent.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousFebruary 15, 2016 at 8:25 AM

      Mr. Ravinder Kumar,the whole purpose of this SC case is to get the scale of promotion post on MACP. Let us hope for the best.

      Delete
  7. UnknownFebruary 15, 2016 at 11:29 AM

    It must be impressed upon the Supreme Court that the Orders of granting Financial up gradation under the MACP should be for all irrespective of class/cadre and not limited to those whose's name figure in the petitions. The problem is with most cadres and not limited to LDC OR UDC

    ReplyDelete
  8. UnknownFebruary 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. UnknownFebruary 16, 2016 at 8:29 AM

    It is hope supreme court have given positive decision and change the policy so many cg govn employees are effect

    ReplyDelete
  10. SENVIJIFebruary 18, 2016 at 2:25 AM

    Pl see the SC list of hearings on 29.02.2016. Our case has been eliminated due to excess matters and is being noted for hearing on 08.03.2016. Lets hope for the best.

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2016 at 3:23 AM

    It can be seen at Sl. No.237 of the lists as under :

    237. SLP(C) NO. 21803/2014
    XIA A/N-H
    3RD LISTING

    UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
    VS.
    M.V. MOHANAN NAIR
    (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR INTERVENTION
    AND INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE
    REPORT)
    MR. B. V. BALARAM DAS
    MR. C. K. SASI
    MR. G. PRAKASH
    MR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD
    GOYAL
    [ELIMINATED DUE TO EXCESS MATTERS. NOW THIS MATTER IS NOTED FOR BEING LISTED ON
    08-03-2016]
    WITH
    SLP(C) NO. 22181/2014
    IVB A/N-H

    U.O.I.& ORS.
    VS.
    REETA DEVI
    (WITH OFFICE REPORT)
    MR. B. V. BALARAM DAS
    MR. O. P. BHADANI
    SLP(C) NO. 23335/2014
    IVB A/N-H

    U.O.I.
    VS.
    DHIRENDER SINGH & ORS.
    (WITH OFFICE REPORT)
    MR. B. V. BALARAM DAS
    MR. O. P. BHADANI
    SLP(C) NO. 23333/2014
    IVB A/N-H

    U.O.I.
    VS.
    BABU RAM & ORS.
    MR. B. V. BALARAM DAS
    MR. O. P. BHADANI
    MR. SUDHIR NAAGAR
    SLP(C) NO. 18227/2015
    XIV A/N-H

    UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
    VS.
    RAJINI KANTA DEKA AND ORS.
    (WITH INTERIM RELIEF AND OFFICE
    REPORT)
    MS. SUSHMA SURI
    MR. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousFebruary 18, 2016 at 3:34 AM

    I wonder as to why the said case is required to be re-listed/ eliminated again and again.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousFebruary 19, 2016 at 3:03 AM

    Once again hearing date has been changed. NDOH 08.03.2016

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)