MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY: LETTER RECEIVED THROUGH E-MAIL FROM SHRI MVSS RAMA KRISHNA OF RAJAHMUNDRY
Respected sir,
I am m.v.s.s.rama Krishna working as LDC in Doordarshan
Maintenance Centre, Rajahmundry which comes under prasar bharati, Ministry of
I&B, Govt. of India. We are treating as working on deemed deputation
to Prasar bharati and still we are govt. employees only. We are covered
by rules and regulations of Central Government only.
Now, coming to the point I am also a sufferer of MACP
scheme. In my case also ACP scheme is more beneficial to me why because
in MACP next available grade pay has been awarded instead of promotional grade
pay. I have joined as LDC on 29-04-1988 and still I am working as LDC though 26
years of service rendered. I have been given Ist ACP after
completion of 12 years of service i.e. on 29-04-2000 to the promotional post of
UDC i.e. from Rs.3050 pay scale to Rs.4,000 pay scale . In the VI th pay
commission my grade pay was fixed at Rs.2,400/- . Next 2 nd MACP
has been given after completion of 20 years, but from the date of
implementation of the scheme ie. 1-9-2008 with grade pay of 2,800/- which
is next grade pay available in the table. Where as our promotion post is
ACCOUNTANT with grade pay of Rs.4,200/-.
It can be observed after the grade pay of Rs.4,200/- ,
next available grade pay and promotional grade pay are one and same for
all the cadres except very less categories. So, the losers are LDC and
UDC only.
It is highly appreciated that you are fighting for the cadres of
LDC and UDC’s.
Sir, I and other my colleagues at Rajahmundry are with you and
please fight for the promotional grade pay in MACP and any support from our
side we will come forward for the same sir.
Sir, What happened to the Hon'ble CAT principle bench case where
in about 18 LDC/UDC of Defence organization has challenged a case in CAT, New
Delhi. Can you sir plz. Give us the latest position. Recently the
Hon'ble High court of Delhi has also dismissed a case filed by govt. So, sir can
we expect the govt. will implement the same judgement of Shri Jaipal to all the
employees or not.
Thanking you, sir
Yours faithfully,
Mvss rama Krishna
All court cases filed for MACP anomaly ended in favour of staffside only. But the DOPT stick on to say that the judgements are personam. This means that DOPT is not applying its mind and dragging all employees to court. DOPT is never minding about the Government money spend in this court case expenditure. After all it is tax amount Paid by Indian citizen, is it not. Well. what ever the DOPTs thinking, the employees should send their anomalies to the Honble PM by using the new web site opened a few days before by him. Our PM is the DOPT minister. Also, our association must send all details about MACP anomalies to PM by using this PMs website.
ReplyDeleteGood Idea, All the association should submite representation on P.M new lounched web site on this MACP matter!
ReplyDeleteRepresentation should be send to PM at the earliest as the babudom in the DOPT are rudderless and have gone mad on this matter. Let association takes a lead and file a representation hope to get favorable reply
ReplyDeleteI am wondered on knowing the fact that a LDC is continuing as LDC even after completing 26 years of service and got one ACP and one MACP. The Govt. should give ACP or MACP on promotional hierarchy every eight years to the Ministerial staff.
ReplyDeleteThere are so many such cases in central govt department but nothing has been done to upgrade these poor LDCs/UDCs by any organisation/ Central Govt.Being low paid employees they are not able to fight in Courts.
ReplyDeleteThanks
Dear Friends,
ReplyDeleteI with eight others have lodged a case regarding MACP in Promotional Hierarchy at CAT/KOL. Our next date is on 13th Aug'14. I would like to request you all to file a case in respective CAT so that we can create pressure to DOPT. As I see there are few people who just comment here in this forum. I would like to request those friends to wake up and give a call to themselves for Justice. Stop commenting here and show your anger by filing a case against this unjust policy of Government. For any further querry regarding my case can contact me in my mail id: somu2401@yahoo.in
The SLPs filed by DOP&T,New Delhi against the Judgments of High Court of Punjab & Haryana,Chandigarh and High Court of Ernakulam(cochin) are listed before the Supreme Court of India on 8th August,2014. These SLPs are against the Judgments passed by Hon'ble High Courts based on the decision in Raj Pal's case. Why not wait for Supreme Court verdict in these cases before wasting money before C.A.T. or other courts.
ReplyDeleteThe date of hearing of SLP in Supreme Court on 22.08.2014
Deletekindly intimate the CASE No. Please because we already discussed with an Advocate. So he need these copies of judgement of High Court of Punjab & Haryana and High court of Ernakulum. If we got the judgement of these copies it is helpful for fight before the H'ble CAT.
DeleteSLP (Civil) [CC] 8271 Of 2014 alongwith SLP(Civil)(CC)10791 of 2014 are to be listed before the Supreme Court on 8.8.2014 whereas other cases i.e. SLP(Civil)(CC) No.10435 and 10436 are scheduled to be listed on 22.8.2014
DeleteSLP(Civil)(CC) 8271 of 2014 has arisen out of judgment and order dated
Delete24/06/2013 in OP 2000/2013 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At
Ernakulam which was further based on judgment in C.W.P.No.19387 of 2011 decided on 19.10.2011 by High Court of Punjab and Haryana,Chandigarh in the case of Raj Pal,Photocopier of C.A.T.,Chandgarh Bench.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Copies of all these judgments are available in this web site.
DeleteTKR Pillai
Sri. Pillai Ji namaste. I have searched the judgment copies of the same through the web site, only High Court of Chandigarh is available. In your site the uploaded judgement copy of CAT Chandigarh is not clearly visible. The Kerala High Court, Ernakulum Bench judgement is also not available. So, I am herewith requesting you to if visible copies are with you kindly once again upload them or if any typed copies are available with you please upload them for taking further action through advocate. We are 5 UDC's from Bengaluru are already taken up this matter to file a case in CAT Bengaluru. Please help us in this regard.
DeleteJudgment and order dated
Delete24/06/2013 in OP 2000/2013 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At
Ernakulam is available on the website of Kerala High Court. Download the same from there, if requred.
Clear/visible copy of CAT Chandigarh Judgment is available with this Association. Please send your e-mail address through SMS. My Mob No. is 09425372172.
DeleteThe High Court Chandigarh/Ernakulam judgments dismissing the writ petition of the UoI are being uploaded. Please download it from this web site by tomorrow.
Dear comrades please use the web site www.indiankanoon.org for any references related to any court case including old judgment, case history etc.,
DeleteI have searched the judgment copy of CAT Chandigarh Bench of Rajpal in OA No. 1038/CH/2010 dt. 31-05-2010 dt.31-05-2011 is not available in the above site. So I request you to kindly upload the visible copy or typed copy of the same urgently. The advocate is repeatedly asking the same for his reference. So, I kindly help us in this regard Pl.
DeleteThe certified copy of judgment, if required , can be obtained through Registrar,C.A.T.,Chandigarh Bench under RTI Act,2005 by depositing fee in the shape of IPO worth Rs.30/-.
DeleteWe dont have CAT bench at our working place or nearby. We have to go Chennai to approach CAT which is 550KM away from our working place. If we have a small chance to approach the CAT we would have filed case. Hence, our hopes are pinning with our Association and with Mr. TKR Pillai.
ReplyDeleteI am working at Delhi University as Technical Assistant since last 25 years on the same post ,recently I got MACP on the basis of next grade pay instead of promotional Hierarcy ,resultant I got Grade pay of Rs 4600 instead of 5400 which were received my colleagues on ACP .So I am the most sufferer of this .Kindly provide me any new news in this direction .P M should be involved in this matter.
ReplyDelete