07/11/SH NEWS

Upgradation of Grade Pay of LDC/UDC: Date of next hearing is 19/07/2018. The date of next hearing on the SLP filed against MACP on promotional hierarchy in Supreme Court is 30/07/2018

Flash message

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL 
HIERARCHY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21803/2014

The case is likely to be listed on  30/07/2018

38 comments:

  1. when the final hearing will be conducted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing is going to happen in this matter. This case is not related to any VIP or Film Star so next listing will be November 2018.

      Delete
    2. After superannuation or after death whichever is earlier.

      Delete
  2. एकता की कमी के कारण सब कुछ हो रहा है

    ReplyDelete
  3. why supreme court is very soft corner towards government giving all possible help to defend this case?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tareek per tareek....tareek per tareek........ and finally NO TAREEK.....Why everybody sleeping still

    ReplyDelete
  5. In this regard a steering committee was formed long before. What happened to it? Till date that committee's involvement, activities etc., has not been disclosed. Will it at least come forward to steer the case and announce the exact status of the MACP case?

    ReplyDelete
  6. MODIJI NE SANDESH DIYA KI AAP MUJE LAKER AAO SAB KE ACHE DIN AAYE GE. IS KO HI TO KAHETA HE ACHE DIN KI KARAMCHARI KO ITNA HARESHMENT KAR DHO KI SARI DEMAND KO BHOOL JAVE

    ReplyDelete
  7. This Govt is systematically destroying all Constitutional Institutions. You see the functioning of CIC, Vigilence Commission, CAG, Election Commission. Now, the Supreme Court is functioning as sub-ordinate of the Govt of India. In this country, you can not expect justice from the courts. Even though judgement are coming in favour of employees, Govt is not implementing. National JCM(Staff side) is a useless body. For the last so many years, we are seeing the attitude of these so called Union Leaders. My suggestion to the Union Leaders to wake up and file cases for the interest of employees.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Supreme court has already given judgement in civil appeal diary no.3744 on 8/12/2017. The judgement is the effective date for implementing MACP must be 01/01/2006 as per 6th CPC. But till date the order was not implemented by DOPT. Our unions never raise the issue and never presurise the Govt.to implement the jujdgement. Our requjest is AIAMSHQ must take up the matter and put effort for implementation of the judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Without any strike the BJP Govt. will not give the justice to the poor employees. We employees were very happy during the Govt. of Cong.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great News . Another bundle of dry leaves shown to the dying Cow (Govt. Employee ) . Koti Koti naman to the most nobel Govt famous for selling Dreams wishes which will never be fulfilled in this present stint of life. May be fulfilled in the next birth.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The supreme court perceives to be hand in glove with the government. That's why in the last 2-3 years the merits of case has not been once discussed. Is the court waiting for the affected Central Govt. employees to retire of die off. Why is it giving so much time to the government to reply on the matter?
    The courts approach seems on the lines that 'Garibon ko hatao, garibi apne aap khatm ho jayegi...'

    ReplyDelete
  12. This the tactics to deprive the legitimate claiment by delaying the judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Counsel of Mr Mohanan Nair should file an application for early hearing of the case by de-tagging the new cases. Kpsingh

    ReplyDelete
  14. When we pointed the blogger before 7CPC acceptance for macp on promotional hierarchy by raising issue on payscale hierarchy as given they said no its on promotional hierarchy now what happened to them? and what they have say on this issue? plz reply

    ReplyDelete
  15. Let us not comment irresponsible. This is how reaction of government also dilutes seeing our depth and maturity.Few such participants are warned not to indulge in any such practices which by any means causes loss .The CAT of several states and Delhi then SC has given inclined expression in favour of our legitimate demand .Now the matter is getting it's tail and at the final stage.Modiji or Rahul has no role to play when matter at apex level.One of our friend said employees were happy during congress regime .....no comment on my friend but that the country is looted has no doubt...corruption lovers were very happy ....forget all this we want the benefit with retrospective effect not by proforma fixation.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Don't use this site for ur political issues.

    ReplyDelete
  17. its not BJP V/S congress or any other party its employees V/S employer Govt we want MACP on promotional hierarchy any why not to raise issue of 7CPC its so called intelligent leaders who do understand the grip of Govt or in another word they mix with the govt who knows?

    ReplyDelete
  18. The matter of MACP and grade pay of LDC & UDC should also be highlighted in the National Media news paper. This will strengthen our demands.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good Idea approach RAVISH. He can do something.

      Delete
  19. *Supreme Court decision*

    FOR INFORMATION OF ALL PENSIONERS
    Forwarded as received:

    Mr Dushyant Dave, President of Supreme Court Bar Association has said that all *21 Lawyers of the SCBA are ready to represent the Veterans in SC on* OROP Pro- Bono (Pro-Bono means without cost to the applicant)

    THIS IS AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE IN RETIRED BANKERS GOOGLE BLOG

    Dear friends,

    It is surprising that a land mark judgement delivered by the Supreme Court of India on 01 07 2015, Civil Appeal no. 1123 of 2015 has gone unnoticed and except for a brief letter from Shri S R Sen Gupta to IBA, no other union has taken any steps. The salient features of the judgement:

    1. The bench has authoritatively ruled that Pension is a right and the payment of it does not depend upon the discretion of the Government. Pension is governed by rules and a Government Servant coming within those rules is entitled to claim pension.

    2. The judgement has recognised that the revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE.

    3. The bench has reiterated that on revision the Basic pension cannot be less than 50% of the Basic Pension in the minimum of the Pay Band in the revised scale corresponding to the pre-revised scale.

    4. The government CANNOT take a plea of financial burden to deny legitimate dues of the pensioners.

    5. The Government SHOULD AVOID unwarranted litigation and not to encourage any litigation for the sake of litigation.

    6. When pension is upheld to be a right and NOT A BOUNTY, as a corollary to the averment that revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE, upgradation of pension is also a RIGHT AND NOT A BOUNTY.

    THE JUDGEMENT IS BASED ON THE DECISION ON D S NAKARA CASE.

    The judgement is very clear and I wonder how no one has noticed the important aspects and why no one has taken up the matter with the Govt.

    Why no one has reacted to the judgement is surprising and perplexing.

    *Dear Pensioners!*

    Forward this msg to a minimum of twenty people (non pensioners too as citizens of India) on your contact list; and in turn ask each of them to do likewise.

    In three days, most people in India will have this message.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Now it is the peak time to raise the demands for raise of grade pay of LDC/UDC. It is the unhappiness of babus that proved their power in the resent election in Karnataka.

    ReplyDelete
  21. To
    The Prime Minister
    Government of India,
    Prime Minister’s Office,
    North Block, New Delhi-110001

    Date: 21-04-2018

    SUB: - TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF SLPs IN HON’BLE
    SUPREME COURT ON SERVICE MATTERS.

    Respected Sir,

    I have the honor to say that thousands of court cases, on service matters, are pending in Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Most of the SLPs are filed by Govt. of India against those aggrieved employees who have already won their cases in both the courts i.e. in Central Administrative tribunals / Provincial Administrative Tribunals as well as in High courts. In this regard I am submitting herewith the following:-

    1- The officers and dealing staff with negative attitude towards the employees do not try to find out a right way to resolve the matter in a lawful manner. As a result the aggrieved employees have no option but to move to the competent courts to get justice.

    2- In most of the cases the aggrieved employees are compelled to go to the courts for their genuine demands/ claims which are not resolved intensely by their respective Departments due to the adamant behavior of competent authorities who become prejudice to the employees when ever the employees ask for their lawful claims.

    3- If the two successive judgments in both the courts i.e. in lower court ( Central Administrative Tribunals / Provincial Service Tribunals ) and as well as in High Courts come in favour of employees, even then the Govt. Deptts. go on filing the appeals / SLPs in Hon’ble Supreme Court every time without taking any pain to know whether the office have any solid evidence in the matter in support go to the apex court.

    4- It has also been seen that in some cases the benefit, based on the judgment of initial court ( CATs / state PSTs ) only, is given to the employee(s) concerned and the Deptt. do not appeal in the next higher court.
    .... Continued.....

    ReplyDelete
  22. 5- After two successive defeats in lower court and as well as in High Court, going to the apex court by the Govt., is the extreme condition of harassment of the aggrieved employee(s) by Govt. officers at the cost of Govt.

    6- I would like to mention here a very famous case SLP ( Civil ) No. 21803 / 2014 Union of India & Ors. Versus M. V. Mohanan Nair ( several other SLPs filed later upto the year 2018 have also been tagged with it) .This case is based on another case of Mr. Rajpal ,a photo copier , of CAT Chandigarh , who won the case in CAT, Chandigarh and Punjab & Haryana High Court , Chandigarh. Even then the SLP was filed in Hon’ble Supreme Court by Union of India after a laps of about one and a half year time, because Govt. did not had any solid evidences. The said SLP was dismissed by Hon’ble Supreme Court and the order has been implemented in favour of Mr. Rajpal of CAT, Chandigarh.

    Mr.M.V.Mohanan Nair is also a photo copier ( a low paid employee like Mr. Rajpal) in another tribunal i.e. in CAT, Principle Branch, Arunachalam , KERALA and the judgments from both the courts i.e.CAT Arunachalam , PB, KERALA and Hon’ble High Court of KERALA have already come in favour of Mr.Mohanan Nair. Even than Union of India has filed SLP in Hon’ble Supreme court. Non other than Mr. Mohanan Nair can feel the plight of his torture by unknown power on the part of Union of India.

    7- Govt. should think on this serious matter due to which number of court cases
    are going on increasing in the apex court and the employees are facing extreme harassment and torture by the Govt.

    8- The Govt. should take cognizance of the fact that after two successive defeats of the Govt., if there is an appeal / SLP in the apex court against the judgment of High Court, the whole cost of the appeal/ SLP should be recovered from the officer concerned, on whose recommendation the appeal was filed in apex court, in case the Govt. appeal/ SLP is dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In addition, an adverse entry should also be recorded in the character roll / ACR / APAR of the officers concerned.

    9- If the aforesaid condition at sl.no.8 is made mandatory, at least for filing SLPs in apex court, the number of cases on service matters will definitely come down to nearly nil. This will save lots of money of the Govt. being spent on such cases and the aggrieved employee(s) will get justice.

    10- If the Govt. take positive steps and frame a uniform policy in this matter, I hope that it will be very much beneficial for all concerned.

    Therefore, it is my humble request to the Hon’ble Prime Minister to look into the matter by keeping in view the points mentioned above that “ the Govt. should not file any SLP /appeal against those orders of High Courts of any state , in service matters, in which the order of lower courts / CATs / state PSTs were also in favour of poor employees”.The aggrieved employees also have to spend heavy amount on account of legal fee, in addition to there harassment for too long period. This will certainly provide natural justice to the aggrieved employees, save lots of money, man power and a great relief to the judiciary by reducing number of court cases in the apex court.


    Thanks
    Yours Sincerely



    ( K.P.SINGH )
    Retd. from Survey of India
    65-Engineers Enclave, Jakhan,
    Rajpur Road, Dehradun:248001
    kpsinghddn@yahoo.co.in

    ReplyDelete
  23. Excellent thinking are you great Man.

    ReplyDelete
  24. govt is playing delaying tactics what to do govt is also loosing credibility

    ReplyDelete
  25. You are right sir

    ReplyDelete
  26. Further as per National Litigation Policy 2010, appeal would not be filed by the Government merely because of the order affects a number of employees.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ravish Kumar may be approached.

    ReplyDelete
  28. He is the mouthpiece of India.

    ReplyDelete
  29. He is the loudspeaker of India.

    ReplyDelete
  30. He can tell our pain well.

    ReplyDelete
  31. He can give a wide stage to our problem because he is associated with media and is known for providing justice to people suffering.

    ReplyDelete
  32. NOW IS THE ELECTION TIME FOR US TO FIGHT FOR DEMANDS OF COURSE MEDIA PLAYS LOT TAKE THE HELP OF MEDIA RLY CAN DO MIRACLE AS THEY ARE LOT NUMBER

    ReplyDelete
  33. CAN ANYBODY GIVE CONTACT NO. OF THOSE WHO WANT TO TAKE THE HELP OF MEDIA WE WILL ALSO JOIN

    ReplyDelete
  34. Due to taking decision late decision how much curse is going to take by the Govt. affected peoples are some are retired and some are on the verge of retirement. Supreme court is delaying or some political influence is being heart. Will the Supreme Court take the decision independently or otherwise.

    ReplyDelete