MACP ON
PROMOTIONAL
HIERARCHY
HIERARCHY
HEARING OF SLP(C) NO. 21803/2014 (UNION
OF INDIA & ORS VS. M.V. MOHANAN NAIR) TAGGED WITH CASE
NUMBERS SLP(C) NO. 22181/2014 , SLP(C) NO. 23335/2014, SLP(C) NO.
23333/2014, SLP(C) NO. 18227/2015 is adjourned.
According
to information received, as soon as the case come up for hearing, the bench was
informed by the court master that services of certain respondents is not
completed. And accordingly the bench ordered to re-list the case after completing the records. It may be
happened due to some typographical error because the case in the same shape was
allowed for hearing on 16/11/2015; at that time the case was postponed due to
the reason that the counsel from Government side sought adjournment and to enable him to prepare the case the court allowed adjournment.
तारीख पर तारीख हो रही है pillai सर पर इंसाफ नही हो रहा है कब होगा इन्साफ अगली बार भी मिलेगी क्या सिर्फ तारीख
ReplyDeleteNext date 7th January as learned from reliable source (one of Respondents)
ReplyDeleteSame old story. It is strange that once file is complete in all respects,then only case is put before the Hon'ble Judges by the Registrar. It seems that SC staff is also taking it in a casual manner. If this is case, why it was not taken care off earlier. This is only delay tactics. It seems that SC and Govt. are in hand-in-glove.
ReplyDeleteThe outcome of the case is eagerly awaited by lakhs of employees for justice.
ReplyDeleteWhat about entry pay of 17150 to promotee assistants?
ReplyDeleteWhat about entry pay of 17150 to promotee assistants?
ReplyDeleteWe should only say... "better late than never" so that our honble court can do a pure justice.
ReplyDeleteWe should hope for better
ReplyDeleteWe should hope for better
ReplyDeleteNext hearing date is 22.02.2016.
ReplyDeleteMr Pillai pl let us know when is the next date of hearing?
ReplyDeleteFor the same reason, previous adjourment was taken.
ReplyDeleteForewarned is forearemed. Against the post on 27/12/2015 it was commented and cautioned that as "Beware:: In Reeta Devi's Case (22181/2014)service of notice is not complete" expecting the possible outcome. The fear came true
ReplyDeleteregards,
The proverb "delayed justice is denied justice" is aptly suits in our case. But I still faith in Justice. Definitely the above said proverb will be re-written by the Hon'ble Bench. Lets wait for positive judgement.
ReplyDeleteHave patience. A number of High Courts and CATs have given positive orders. You can hoe for the best from hon'ble Apex court.
ReplyDeleteHii
ReplyDeletePillai sir, pl let us know next date of hearing
ReplyDeletewhen will come good news
ReplyDeleteAs per reply by MOS in Parliament the judgements are only applicable to the individual applicants named in the SLP. Please ensure that the orders/judgements of SC is applicable to one and all categories by issue of DOPT ORDERS
ReplyDeleteAs per reply by MOS in Parliament the judgements are only applicable to the individual applicants named in the SLP. Please ensure that the orders/judgements of SC is applicable to one and all categories by issue of DOPT ORDERS
ReplyDeleteAs per reply in Parliament by MOS the judgement of lower court i.e CAT or High Court is only applicable to the applicant. The judgement of Apex Court applicable to all.
DeleteThe Apex court should not extend further date for the case because the motto of Govt. of India is to just delay it. Whenever the next date comes the final decision to be given. Hope the Apex court will take not of it because this case relates to the fate of lakhs of LDC/UDC in Sub-ordinate offices of Govt. of India.
ReplyDeleteHon'ble Supreme Court is highly requested to give verdict on the just next date. Kindly don't delay further. It has already taken too much time.
ReplyDelete7TH CPC is requested to upgrade the grade pay of all Sub-Inspectors of all CAPFs, RPF, Delhi Police RPSF and corresponding/equivalent posts of Deputy Field Officers in SSB, R&AW, ARC etc and Intelligence Officers in Narcotics Control Bureau etc because they are also doing good job under same ministry of Home Affairs and they have already been the historical pay parity in all the Pay Commission. Thanks
ReplyDelete7TH CPC is requested to upgrade the grade pay of all Sub-Inspectors of all CAPFs, RPF, Delhi Police RPSF and corresponding/equivalent posts of Deputy Field Officers in SSB, R&AW, ARC etc and Intelligence Officers in Narcotics Control Bureau etc because they are also doing good job under same ministry of Home Affairs and they have already been the historical pay parity in all the Pay Commissions with ACIO-II of I.B. and Sub-Inspector of CBI etc. Thanks
ReplyDelete1
ReplyDeleteITEM NO.2 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21803/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24/06/2013
in OP No. 2000/2013 passed by the High Court of Kerala at
Ernakulam)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M.V. MOHANAN NAIR Respondent(s)
(with appln. (s) for intervention)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 22181/2014
(With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 23335/2014
(With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 23333/2014
(With Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 18227/2015
(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing the spare copies and Interim
Relief and Office Report)
Date : 04/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
For Petitioner(s)
Ms.Pinky Anand, ASG
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv.
Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, Adv.
Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. V.Giri, Sr. Adv.
Mr. C.K. Sasi, Adv.
Mr. Jayanth Muth Raj, Adv.
Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., Adv.
2
Mr. O.P. Bhadani, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Anand, Adv.
Mr. Rakesh Kr. Singh, Adv.
Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury, Adv.
Mr. T.N. Durga Prasad, Adv.
Mr. Akash Garg, Adv.
Mr. Sudhir Nagar, Adv.
Mr. Karamveer Singh, Adv.
Mr. G. Prakash,Adv.
Mr. Jishnu M.L., Adv.
Ms. Priyanka Parkash, Adv.
Mr. C. Bhadri Nath Babu, Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.
Mr. C.M. Angadi, Adv.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners to take steps for service
on unserved respondents, if any, within two weeks.
Parties to complete the pleadings in the meantime.
(ASHOK RAJ SINGH) (SAROJ SAINI)
Court Master Court Master
services of some respondents is not completed. can any one can explain and throw light what does it mean. will it any way affect the case ,kindly tell us .
ReplyDeleteservices of some respondents is not completed. can any one can explain and throw light what does it mean. will it any way affect the case ,kindly tell us .
ReplyDeleteWe all affected employees are waiting for the good news from Honorable Supreme court.If god exist anywhere on earth he will definitely come for our help in supreme court in next hearing ,otherwise there in not end of this tunnel.
ReplyDeleteIt is indeed very sad and disappointing to note that such simple and straight cases which need not have gone to the courts in the first instance, and sould have been settled much earlier by the Deptts/DoPT itself, have been allowed by the govt to come to such an impass where no justice seems being done to the victims of biased bureaucratic tendency of the authorities. The courts are also simply adding salt to injuries by its perenial delaying tactics.
ReplyDelete