RED TAPISM OF MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CADRE REVIEW IN RESPECT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE CADRE OF MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICE
A letter on the above subject, received
from the All India MES Admn Cadre & Ministerial Staff Association is
published below. It is pertinent to mention here that the cadre review proposal
of the Administrative Staff of NSSO Offices has also been pending with Department of Expenditure from
2011. This Association is also eager to write a letter to the Finance Minister
on the issue.
Government of India
ReplyDeleteMinistry of Railways
(Railway Board)
No. E(W)2014/ED-2/4
New Delhi, Dated 24.09.2014
The General Manager (P),
All Indian Railways &
Production Units.
Sub: Grant of Children Education allowance/Hostel subsidy to third child when first / second child is not in a position to go to school due to severe disability.
References have been received from Zonal Railways seeking clarification regarding admissibility of Children Education Allowance / Hostel Subsidy in respect of third child of the Railway employee when the first / second child is not in a position to go to school as he/she is born with profound mental retardation or is totally invalid and cannot even go to a school meant for the special children.
2. The matter has been examined in consultation with DOP&T, the nodal Department in respect of aforesaid policy and they have intimated vide OM No.A-27012/1/2014-Estt(AL) dated 26-08-2014 that Children Education Allowance/Hostel Subsidy shall be admissible only for the eldest two surviving children except when the number of children exceeds two as a result of second child birth resulting in twins or multiple births. Copy of DoP&T’s OM is enclosed for information and guidance of all.
3. This disposes of CORE’s letter number E/O/39 dated 05-06-2-2014 & ICF’s letter number PB/WI/Misc/2014 dated 09-06-2014 on the matter.
sd/-
(Debasis Mazumdar)
Director Estt. (Welfare)
Railway Board
The DOPT, Min.of Fin, & Dept.of Exp wizards, by & then, here & there, every where and every time, are never fail to display their mindless acts sincerely. The above order explain the red tapism. When a employee cannot send first two children due to reasons of out of human kind nature to school, the third child and fourth he can send. CEA is refused by citing that the first and second children are alone eligible and the 3rd & 4rth are not eligible is a mind less decision. After all the employees are going to claim CEA for two children only. This is the highly pathetic condition present in central government.
They are insisting the employees to go to Court, First CAT Second High Court Third to Supreme Court and thereafter struggle of association
ReplyDeleteKahin salo k baad hamara MES association jaag gaya hai
ReplyDelete