07/11/SH NEWS

Upgradation of Grade Pay of LDC/UDC: Date of next hearing is 01/04/2020.

Flash message

Friday, October 17, 2014

MACP ON PROMOTIONAL HIERARCHY:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF MA CASE OF SMT REETA DEVI, BABU RAM & DHIRENDER SINGH ON 17/10/2014 IS GIVEN BELOW:


15 comments:

  1. Thank you for this up dated information. We are confused. Please clear the doubts that which applications are dismissed. What was requested in that application. Is there any set back to staff side. Your valuable explanations will be highly appreciated. We are once again thanking you for your relentless efforts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Plz explain about this order who will be favoured

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The above I.As were filed by the respondents in the SLPs for vacation of stay order but the Apex Court did not fine any merit in these applications and all the SLPs are now to be listed before the Supreme Court on 16.12.2014 as per website of the Supreme Court. The order dated 17.10.2014 would reveal that there were 8 govt. counsels including Solicitor General and Assistant Solicitor General who represented Union of India whereas only three advocates represented the respondents in the above cases.

      Delete
  3. The payments (TA, hotel bills & other allowances) paid to the Govt. counsels or advocates by the Govt. of India in defending the case is more than sufficient to give the MACP in promotional hierarchy. The low paid employees are always the sufferers in whatever be the cases.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What was the prayer made in this application?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prayer was for vacation of stay already granted by the Supreme Court in the SLPs

      Delete
  5. Namaskar Pillai Ji. the H'ble Sure Court of India is stated that prima facie, there is no justification for accepting the prayer made in these applications. The same are accordingly dismissed. The actual delivery of the H'ble Supreme Court is not able to under stand. Some people are saying that the SLP filed by the DOPT are dismissed accordingly the final verdict is going to be announced in the next hearing. In the same line some people are telling that the stay on the H'ble High Court orders are vacated. Kindly advise us what is the actual position in this matter.

    Thanking you Sir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The application filed by Babu Ram, Reeta Devi and Dhirender Singh for vacation of Stay was dismissed not the SLP. All the SLPs will come for hearing on 16/12/14.

      Delete
  6. Sir, you can only clearly explain the doubts.... please sir...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Respected Pillai Sir, after seeing the above RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS of Supreme Court, there is a doubt arises to every body ( who are waiting for the favourable judgement ) that what was the prayer of DOPT or from respondent ( Smt. Reeta Devi ). You are the only person to give the clear justification/ information on these issue. It has been observed that the Confederation of Central Govt. Employees is not initiating any action on this issue or any help to the respondents like financially, legally etc., Why sir. because the leaders of the confederation is still not open their mouth in this regard. Simply writing a letter to DOPT and sitting idle is not justification. Kindly give your valuable advise on the RECORD OF PRECEEDINGS Please Sir.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Respected pillai Je if the case is decided in favour of employees then will there be general order from dopt for all employees or every department have to file their plea individually.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sri. Pillai Ji. You have informed that the Meeting of Steering Committee on MACP was going to be held on 12-10-2014. But till today the Meeting Outcome has not published in you blog. What happens Sir that day i.e on 12/13-10-02014. Kindly upload the same sir. Once again I am very grateful to you that you are doing well along with other unions Secretary general, Kindly help the respondents in SLP's financially and legally. If any financial help needed from the LDC/UDC's kindly upload the Bank A/c No. Immediately for contribution from our side. We will also help the respondents financially for which they are struggling for them and for all Central Govt. Similarly placed employees who are effected by MACP.

    Thanking you Sir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The last option to be fought in the Supreme court shall be- the aggrieved employee can choose either MACP or ACP,whichever benefits him/her most.

      Delete
  10. Above mentioned case was listed on 17.10.2014 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India regarding eviction of stay of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India against their order dated 22.08.2014 in SLP Nos. 22181/2014,23333/2014 and 23335/2014. Now the case is to be listed on 16.12.2014 before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. As you know there is always two sides of a coin, among us there are some employees are with us and some have negative thinking as we can see in many comments as raised by the employees. There was a meeting on 25.09.2014 held in New Delhi as per Mr. S.B. Chobey, General Secretary, his Association had decided to bear the expenses of one Advocate to defend the case in Supreme Court. It has been observed that the Confederation of Central Govt. Employees is not initiating any action on this issue or any help to us likely financially, legally etc., Why Sir ? It is hereby stated that this is climax. If we succeed in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India every MACP effected Central Government Employees will gain and if we failed .............?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I do agree with the above comments. The confederation should do something in the matter as the outcome of the case will directly affect thousands of government employees. As is evident from the above the government is being represented by senior legal experts like SG/ASG etc., an active role of the Confederation is expected to help the respondents financially or otherwise. It may upload the Bank A/c No. for contribution.This will be in the interest of employees who are affected by MACP.

    Thanking you Sir.

    ReplyDelete