MCM Grade Pay Issue in Ordnance Establishments - Granting of 4600 Grade Pay to Master Craftsman (MCM) on 3rd MACP for Defence Civilians Employees
INDWF General Secretary Shri.R.Srinivasan writes to DOPT Secretary regarding the matter of granting 4600 Grade Pay to MCM on 3rd financial upgradation on MACP Scheme in Defence Establishments. He explained about the status of MCM cadre in the 5th CPC and he also appealed to grant of 4600 Grade Pay to MCM on 3rd MACP as per the Dopt clarification of 2001... The text of the letter is reproduced and given below for your information...
Granting of Rs.4600 to MCM on 3rd MACP for Defence civilians
INDWF
To
Secretary,
DOP&T
New Delhi
Secretary,
DOP&T
New Delhi
Brief about Master Craftsman granting MACP – III to Rs.4600/-
Grade Pay in Defence
- Master
Craftsman in Defence were drawing the pay scale Rs.4500 – 7000 prior to
01.01.2006.
- Through
Fast Track committee on the recommendations of 6th CPC, Master craftsman
(MCM) were upgraded to Rs.4200/- Grade Pay w.e.f. 01.01.2006 at par with
Railways – vide M of D letter No.11 (5)/2009-D(Civ-I) dt 14.06.2010 and
the re-structuring of Artisans were implemented by introducing 4 grade
structure i.e., Skilled, HS Grade – II, HS Grade-I and MCM with a ratio of
45 : 20.625 : 20.625 : 13.75% respectively.
- Principle
Controller of Accounts Fys (PC of A(FYS), Kolkatta vide their letter
No.Pay/Tech-II/04/2011/15 dated 26.10.2011 and 12.12.2011 clarified that
the Industrial Employees who become MCM before 01.01.2006 is eligible for
3rd MACP in the Grade Pay of Rs.4600/-
ISSUE
|
CLARIFICATION
|
Whether an Industrial Employee who
was placed to MCM before 01.01.2006 and promoted to MCM on 01.01.2006 is
eligible for 3rd MACP with Grade Pay of Rs.4600 after 30 years on the plea
that he was granted only two up-gradations in his entire service i.e. Skilled
to HS and HS to MCM
|
YES, such MCM is eligible for 3rd
MACP with Grade Pay Rs.4600/- after 30 years of service if found otherwise
eligible, as they got two promotions prior to 01.01.2006 i.e. Skilled to HS
and HS to MCM. But those Industrial Employees who were not placed to MCM
before 01.01.2006 are not eligible for 3rd MACP because such persons have got
or shall get promotion from Skilled to HS –II, from HS II to HS I and HS I to
MCM, so there is no scope for 3rd MACP upgradation.
|
- .
After issue of the above clarifications by the PC of A (FYS)
Kolkatta, Master Craftsman (MCM) who became MCM before 01.01.2006 were granted
3rd MACP to Rs.4600/- Grade Pay on completion of 30 years of service.
Subsequently the DOP&T vide their letter DOP&T
I.D.No.7680/12/CR dated 13.07.2012 and M of D I.D. No.11 (5)/2009-D (Civ-I)
Dated 23.07.2012 clarified.
a) Para 8 of Annexure-1 of DOP&T OM No.35034/3/2008-Est(D)
dt. 19.05.2009 of MACPs provides that promotion earned in the post carrying
same grade pay in the promotional post carrying same grade pay in the
promotional hierarchy as per recruitment rules shall be counted for the purpose
of MACPs. Financial up-gradation under MACPs in respect of Master Craftsman
will be in the same Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- as that of the Promotional post of
Chargeman.
b) ACP/MACP schemes have been introduced by the Government in
order to mitigate stagnation faced by employees due to lack of promotional
avenues. Financial up-gradation under ACP/MACP scheme cannot be more than what
can be allowed to an employee on his normal promotion. It may be classified
that placement of Highly Skilled Grade as Master Craftsman prior to 01.01.2006
is to be treated as one Promotion for the purpose of MACP benefits.
After issue of the above clarifications, the IEs who became MCM
prior to 01.01.2006 and who were granted Rs.4200/- Grade Pay were denied the
3rd MACP and the up-gradation of Pay was considered as promotion. Similarly,
MCM who got Chargeman which is also having identical pay were also counted as
promotion and the Grade Pay Rs.4600/- granted have been denied. Now, accounts
authorities have fixed pay be revising to Rs.4200/- Grade Pay accordingly, MCM
employees on their superannuation, pension and all other terminal benefits have
been re-fixed and paid on the Grade Pay of Rs.4200/-.
Representation was sent by the Federations and by Ordnance Factory
Board to M of D which was forwarded to DOP&T in which we have submitted
that:
As per clarification No.35 of DOP&T OM
F.No.35035/1/97-Estt(D)(Vol-IV) dt 15th July 2001 which is being reproduced.
Sl.No
|
Point of Doubt
|
Clarification
|
35
|
Whether Placement/ Appointment in
higher scales of Pay based on the recommendation of the Pay commissions or
committees set up to rationalize the cadre is to be reckoned as
Promotion/Financial up-gradation and offset against the two financial
up-gradations applicable under the ACP Scheme?
|
Where all the post are placed in
Higher scale of Pay, with or without a change in the designation, without
requirement of any new qualification for holding the post in the higher
grade, not specified in the Recruitment Rules for the existing post and
without involving any change in responsibilities and duties, then placement
of all the incumbents against such upgraded posts is not be treated as
promotion/upgradation
|
a) As per DOP&T OM of 2001 mentioned above, it is clear
that all the posts of MCM as on 31.12.2005 were enbloc upgraded to higher pay
scale, the higher pay scale granted to MCM w.e.f 01.01.2006 cannot be treated
as promotion. Accordingly the MCM who are placed in the pre-revised pay scale
of Rs.5000-8000 w.e.f 01.01.2006 are entitled for their next ACP/MACP in PB2
+Grade Pay Rs.4600/- by ignoring the higher pay scale granted to them w.e.f.
01.01.2006.
b) The post of MCM was not a post of hierarchy prior to 01.01.2006
and it was part of HS Grade. The ratio which was introduced for Industrial
Employees in M of D w.e.f. 20.05.2003, the ratio was 45:55 between Skilled and
HS Grade respectively 25% of 55% was placed as MCM which is a part of hierarchy
till 31.12.2005. Therefore MCM placed from HS Grade was not treated as
promotion only after 01.01.2006; it was treated as a separate grade.
c) The post of MCM, is part of hierarchy w.e.f.01.01.2006 but not
a feeder post to Chargeman and as such any movement from MCM to Chargeman
cannot be treated as promotion in the identical Grade Pay.
From 20.05.2003
|
w.e.f 01.01.2006
|
Skilled - 45%
|
Skilled - 45%
|
HS Grade - 55%
|
HS Grade II - 20.625%
|
MCM - 25% of 55%
|
HS Grade I - 20.625%
|
Only two grades were there till
31.12.2005
|
MCM - 13.75%
|
Thus, till 31.12.2005, MCM was part of HS Grade and it was treated
as part of HS Grade and was treated as placement and not counted for ACP.
Skilled -------- HS Grade I Promotion/ I ACP
HS Grade --- MCM II ACP
MCM --------- was granted 3rd MACP w.e.f. 01.09.2008
Further, ACP – II to the erstwhile pay of Rs.5000-8000 was granted
prior to the promotion of MCM and subsequently they were promoted to Rs.4500 –
7000 but they continue to draw the ACP scale Rs.5000 – 8000 prior to
01.01.2006.
They were also denied the benefit of 3rd MACP after 01.09.2008
which is unfair.
MCM to Chargeman is not a feeder post only as per SRO HS I is the
feeder post thus MCM to be treated as re-designation and not as promotion.
Therefore, denial of 3rd MACP is not as per the DOP&T
clarification of 2001.They should be allowed to continue in Rs.4600/- Grade Pay
as was granted.
Yours Sincerely,
(R.SRINIVASAN)
General Secretary/INDWF
& Member National Council (JCM) Standing Committee
Reference Dopt order is given below for your ready reference...
F.No.35034/1/97-Estt(D)(Vol.IV)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi 110001
July 18, 2001
July 18, 2001
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: - ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME FOR THE CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES - CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING
The undersigned is directed to invite reference to the Department
of Personnel and Training Office Memorandum of even number dated August 9, 1999
regarding the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) and subsequent Office
Memorandum dated February 10, 2000 clarifying the various points of doubt
received from various quarters.
2. Some more situations in which a doubt persists in various organizations
in regard to applicability/implementation of ACP Scheme have been brought to
the notice of this Department. These have been duly examined and appropriate
advice has been conveyed in individual cases. However, as it is observed that
similar doubts are being received from various other
Ministries/Departments/Organizations, it has been considered appropriate to
issue a second set of clarificatory orders containing point-wise clarification
to the additional points of doubt.
3. Cases where the ACP Scheme has already been implemented shall
be reviewed/rectified if the same are not found to be in accordance with the
scheme/clarifications. 3. All Ministries/Departments may give wide circulation
to these clarificatory instructions for general guidance and appropriate action
in the matter.
4. Hindi version would follow.
(R.K. GOEL)
DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA
DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA
ANNEXURE
[Reference: Office Memorandum No. 35034/1/97-Estt(D)(Vol.IV) dated
18.7.2001]
S.No.
|
Point of doubt
|
Clarification
|
33.
|
An employee was promoted from Grade ‘A’ to Grade ‘C’.
Grade ‘B’ was introduced in the hierarchy in between Grade ‘A’ and Grade ‘C’
subsequent to such promotion. Will he be entitled to any more financial
upgradation under the ACP Scheme (ACPS) considering that he is already placed
in the third level of the hierarchy?
|
The reply is in the affirmative. The employee has got only
one promotion in his career as per the hierarchy existing at the time of his
promotion. The subsequent creation of the post in Grade ‘B’ will not,
therefore, make any material difference in the situation in relation to the
case of this employee for the purpose of grant of second financial
upgradation under ACPS The newly created Grade ‘B’ would, as such, need to be
ignored in his case. However, persons in Grade ‘A’, who become entitled to
financial upgradation only after introduction of Grade ‘B’ in the hierarchy,
will be entitled for grant of financial upgradation only in Grade ‘B’ subject
to fulfillment of the other stipulations and conditions specified in the ACP
Scheme introduced on 9.8.1999.
|
34.
|
An employee has superannuated after 9.8.1999, i.e. the
date from which ACPS was introduced. He had completed the required
eligibility service as on 9.8.1999 for grant of financial upgradation but he
retired on superannuation before the Screening Committee could meet to assess
his suitability for grant of benefits under ACPS. Will he be entitled for
financial upgradation under ACPS?
|
In terms of condition no. 3 of the ACP Scheme introduced
vide O.M. dated 9.8.1999, the financial benefit under the ACPS shall be
granted from the date of completion of the eligibility period prescribed
under the ACPS or from the date of issue of the instructions whichever is
later. Therefore, in respect of employees who had completed eligibility
service as on 9.8.1999 but retired prior to meeting of the first Screening
Committee meeting, if the assessment to decide grant of financial upgradation
is based on ACRs and other service records, the employees who retired after
9.8.1999 may also be considered by the Screening Committee and, if
recommended for grant of financial upgradation, such employees may be allowed
the benefit of ACPS from the due date. If, however, the assessment also
includes passing of a trade test/skill test/written examination (as
prescribed for regular promotion) under ACPS and the employee had not
qualified in such tests already, then it may not be possible to consider the
retired persons, as assessment based on such tests is not possible after the
date of superannuation.
|
35.
|
Whether placement/appointment in higher scales of pay
based on the recommendations of the Pay Commissions or Committees set up to
rationalise the cadres is to be reckoned as promotion/financial upgradation
and offset against the two financial upgradations applicable under the ACP
Scheme?
|
Where all the posts are placed in a higher scale of pay,
with or without a change in the designation; without requirement of any new
qualification for holding the post in the higher grade, not specified in the
Recruitment Rules for the existing post, and without involving any change in
responsibilities and duties, then placement of all the incumbents against
such upgraded posts is not be treated as promotion/upgradation. Where,
however, rationalisation/restructuring involves creation of a number of new hierarchical
grades in the rationalised set up and some of the incumbents in the
pre-rationalised set up are placed in the hierarchy of the restructured set
up in a grade higher than the normal corresponding level taking into
consideration their length of service in existing
pre-structured/pre-rationalised grade, then this will be taken as
promotion/upgradation.
If the rationalised/restructured grades require possession
of a specific nature of qualification and experience, not specified for the
existing posts in pre-rationlised set up, and existing incumbents in
pre-rationalised scales/pre-structured grades, who are in possession of the
required qualification/ experience are placed directly in the rationalised
upgraded post, such placement will also not be viewed as
promotion/upgradation. However, if existing incumbents in the
pre-rationalised grades who do not possess the said qualification/ experience
are considered for placement in the corresponding rationalised grade only
after completion of specified length of service in the existing grade, then
such a placement will be taken as promotion/upgradation.
Where placement in a higher grade involves assumption of
higher responsibilities and duties, then such upgradation will be viewed as
promotion/upgradation.
Where only a part of the posts are placed in a higher
scale and rest are retained in the existing grade, thereby involving
redistribution of posts, then it involves creation of another grade in the
hierarchy requiring framing of separate recruitment rules for the upgraded
posts. Placement of existing incumbents to the extent of upgradations
involved, in the upgraded post will also be treated as promotion/upgradation
and offset against entitlements under the ACPS.
For any doubts in this regard, matter should be referred
to the Department of Personnel and Training (Establishment ‘D’ Section)
giving all relevant details.
|
36.
|
An employee was initially appointed on deputation in a
grade higher than the grade of the post held on regular basis and was subsequently
absorbed against the ex-cadre post. Will such initial period of deputation in
the higher grade prior to date of absorption be counted towards residency
period/ ‘regular service’ for purposes of ACPS?
|
In reply to points of doubt No. 4 to 6 in DoP&T O.M.
dated 10.2.2000, it has been stated that where a person is appointed on
direct recruitment/transfer basis from another post in the same grade, then
past regular service as well as past promotions, in the earlier post, will be
counted for computing regular service for the purpose of ACPS in the new
hierarchy. The reason being that so long as service is in the same scale
during the period in question, it is immaterial whether he has been holding
different posts in the same scale. However, if the appointment is made to a
post in a higher grade, then such appointment , whether by direct recruitment
or by transfer or initially on deputation followed by absorption, will be
treated as direct recruitment and past service/promotion (which was in a
different scale) will not be counted
In the case where a person is appointed to an ex-cadre
post in higher scale initially on deputation followed by absorption, while
the service rendered in the earlier post, which was in a lower scale can not
be counted, there is no objection to the period spent initially on deputation
in the ex-cadre post prior to absorption being counted towards regular
service for the purposes of grant of financial upgradation under ACPS as it
is in the same scale of pay and same post.
|
37.
|
Whether it is necessary to have SC/ST members in the
Screening Committees set up for grant of ACPS?
|
As clarified vide condition no. 12 of ACP Scheme (vide
DoP&T O.M. dated 9.8.1999), reservation orders/roster shall not apply to
the ACP Scheme. Consequently, it is not necessary to have an officer from
SC/ST communities on the Screening Committee constituted for deciding the
suitability of the employee for upgradations under ACPS.
|
38.
|
A person has refused a vacancy-based promotion offered to
him prior to his becoming eligible for financial upgradation under ACPS, on
personal grounds. Will he be eligible for financial upgradation under ACPS? A
person had refused a regular promotion for personal reasons. He has since
completed 24 years’ of service. Will he be entitled for 2nd financial
upgradation?
|
The ACP Scheme has been introduced to provide relief in
cases of acute stagnation where the employees, despite being eligible for
promotion in all respects, are deprived of regular promotion for long periods
due to non-availability of vacancies in the higher grade. Cases of holders of
isolated posts have also been covered under ACPS, as they do not have any
promotional avenues. However, where a promotion has been offered before the
employee could be considered for grant of benefit under ACPS but he refuses
to accept such promotion, then he cannot be said to be stagnating as he has
opted to remain in the existing grade on his own volition. As such, there is
no case for grant of ACPS in such cases. The official can be considered for
regular promotion again after the necessary debarment period.
In the second case also, since in terms of condition No.
10 of the ACPS, on grant of ACPS, the employee shall be deemed to have given
his unqualified acceptance for regular promotion on occurrence of vacancy,
the officer will have to give in writing his acceptance of the regular
promotion when offered again after the debarment period before he can be
considered for grant of second financial upgradation under ACPS.
|
39.
|
An employee is appointed to a lower grade as a result of
unilateral transfer on personal request in terms of FR 15(2). Will the period
of service rendered in the higher post count for the purposes of ACPS?
|
Condition no. 14 of the ACPS (DoP&T O.M. dated
9.8.1999), inter-alia, states that in case of transfer including unilateral
transfer on request, regular service rendered in previous organisation shall
be counted along with regular service in the new organisation for the
purposes of getting financial upgradation under the Scheme. This condition
covers cases where a unilateral transfer is to a lower post. However,
financial upgradations under the ACPS shall be allowed in the hierarchy of
the new post.
|
40.
|
An employee drawing pay in the scale of Rs.800-1150
(pre-revised) was declared surplus and was re-deployed as Peon in a Ministry
through the Surplus Cell in the scale of Rs.750-940 (pre-revised). However,
he was allowed to draw pay in the scale of Rs.800-1150 as personal to him
even after redeployment in the lower grade. What shall be his entitlements
under ACPS?
|
As the employee has remained in the scale of Rs.800-1150
all along and has not availed any promotion, he is entitled to two financial
upgradations in a scale higher than Rs.800-1150 (pre-revised) irrespective of
the post actually held after redeployment. Since in the Ministry, a Group ‘D’
employee is eligible for promotion to the grade of LDC provided he is a
matriculate and as a post in the scale of Rs.825-1200 (S-4) is not in the
normal hierarchy in the Secretariat, such an employee can be considered for
two financial upgradations in the grades of LDC and UDC provided he is a
matriculate Otherwise he will get only one financial upgradation in the revised
scale of Rs.825-1200 (Rs.2750-4400 revised). Cases of other persons
re-deployed to lower posts through the Surplus Cell may also be regulated
accordingly.
|
41.
|
A cadre consists of 4 Grades - ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ (in
ascending order). Upon restructuring of a cadre, Grade ‘B’ is abolished from
a date subsequent to 9.8.1999. Employees recruited in Grade ‘A’, who are
eligible for financial upgradation on or after 9.8.1999 but before the date
of effect of restructuring, get first/second financial upgradation in Grade
‘B’ and Grade ‘C’ respectively but those who become eligible for financial
upgradation after the restructuring has been effected are entitled to first
financial upgradation in Grade ‘C’ and second financial upgradation in Grade
‘D’. This is anomalous. The cases of earlier set of employees should be
reviewed and they may be allowed financial upgradations as applicable to the
latter category of employees.
|
The benefit of ACP Scheme is to be allowed as per the
hierarchy existing, as on the date the employees become eligible for
financial upgradation under ACPS. . Cadres/hierarchical structures are never
static and are always subject to review based on recommendations of Pay
Commissions/Expert Committees or otherwise and it is not possible to review
the entitlements under ACPS already earned every time a cadre is reviewed.
ACPS is only a temporary solution to provide relief to stagnating employees
and the lasting solution for stagnation lies in review of cadre structures,
as regular promotions will be earned in such restructured grades. All the
employees will benefit from such cadre restructuring.
|
42.
|
An employee in Grade ‘A’ is eligible for promotion
simultaneously to Grades ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ (in ascending order) with varying
requirements of length of service in the present grade. In other words, he
has multiple channels of promotion. What shall be his eligibility under the
ACP?
|
Provisions in the existing Recruitment Rules in various
organisations providing for multiple channels for promotion are not
consistent with the guidelines on framing of the Recruitment Rules. All such
Rules should be reviewed immediately so as to provide only a single channel
of promotion. However, till such a review is undertaken, the first financial
upgradation in such cases shall be allowed with reference to the lowest
promotional Grade which is Grade ‘B’ If he does not earn any promotion in 24
years, his second financial upgradation will be as per the hierarchy of Grade
‘B’. However, if he has already earned one regular promotion, then his second
financial upgradation shall be as per the hierarchy of the Grade to which he
has been promoted.
|
43.
|
Whether service rendered in an autonomous body/statutory
body/ State Government prior to appointment in Central Government as a direct
recruit prior to appointment in the Central Government will be counted while
computing regular service for the purpose of grant of financial upgradations
under the ACP Scheme?
|
ACP Scheme is applicable to Central Government Civilian
employees and for the purpose of financial upgradations under the ACP Scheme,
only the regular service rendered after regular appointment in a Central
Government civilian post is to be counted. Therefore, service rendered in an
autonomous body/statutory body/State Government is not to be counted for the
purpose. Correspondingly, promotions earned in these bodies prior to appointment
in the Central Government are also to be ignored. The clarification in reply
to point of doubt no. 4 to 6 in DoP&T O.M. dated 10.2.2000 providing for
counting of past service in another organisation in the same grade is only in
relation to past service in a civilian post held in the Central Government.
|
44.
|
On the basis of recommendations of the Fifth Central Pay
Commission, a uniform pay structure has been introduced for Stenographers in
the non-Secretariat organisations whereby the posts have been distributed in
the ratio of 40:40:20 in the grades of Stenographer Grade-III (Rs.4000-6000),
Stenographer Grade-II (Rs.5000-8000) and Stenographers Grade-I (Rs.5500-9000)
However, in a particular non-Secretariat organisation, there is only an isolated
post of Stenographer in the scale of Rs.4000-6000. Will he be entitled to
financial upgradations in the scale of Rs.4500-7000 and Rs.5000-8000 as per
Annexure II to O.M. dated 9.8.1999 or can he be allowed financial
upgradations in the grades of Stenographer Grade-II and Stenographer Grade-I
?
|
In reply to point of doubt No. 10 in DoP&T O.M. dated
10.2.2000, it has been stated that the scales of pay for ACPS for isolated
posts shall be same as those applicable for similar posts in the same
Ministry/Department/Cadre except where the Pay Commission has recommended
specific pay scales for mobility under ACPS. Such cases may be specifically
examined by respective Ministries/Departments in consultation with the
Department of Personnel and Training. In the case of remaining isolated
posts, the pay scales contained in Annexure-II of O.M. dated August 9, 1999
shall apply. Thus, hierarchy in Annexure-II of O.M. dated August, 9, 1999
applies where Pay Commission has not made any specific recommendation
regarding scales to be allowed under the ACPS and where it is not possible to
identify similar posts in same organisation. In the case of stenographers in
non-Secretariat organisations, which is a common category post, the Pay
Commission has recommended a uniform grade structure for which has been
accepted by the Government. Since the isolated post of Stenographer in scale
of Rs.4000-6000 in a subordinate office is comparable to corresponding posts
of Stenographer Grade-III in other non-Secretariat organisations under the
same Ministry, the uniform pay (grade) structure for Stenographers may be
adopted for the purpose of allowing financial upgradations to the said
isolated post. In the instant case of an isolated post of Stenographer
(Rs.4000-6000) in a non-Sect organisation, first and the second financial
upgradations may be allowed in the scales of Rs.5000-8000 (Steno Grade-II)
and Rs.5500-9000 (Stenographer Grade-I) respectively provided he is otherwise
eligible. A similar approach can be adopted in respect of all other isolated
posts belonging to common categories for which Pay Commission has similarly
recommended a uniform grade structure which has been accepted and notified in
part ‘B’ of the Ministry of Finance notification dated September 30, 1997 or
agreed to by the Government subsequently. If such an isolated post is in a
Central Ministry/Department, then the structure as recommended and accepted
for similar common category posts in the Central Ministry/ Department may be
adopted. If the isolated post is in a non-Secretariat organisation, then the
uniform hierarchy as recommended for similar posts in the non-Secretariat
organisations may be followed.
|
45.
|
In certain organisations, an employee after his selection
on direct recruitment basis or even on promotion is required to undergo an
induction training before he is given a functional post. Whether such
induction training shall count towards the eligibility service for ACPS?
|
If under the relevant Recruitment/Service Rules, the
induction training counts towards eligibility service for regular promotion,
the same will also be counted towards the 12-years/24 years residency
period/regular service required for financial upgradations under ACP Scheme.
|
46.
|
A person is working in the immediate promotional grade on
ad-hoc basis. Is he eligible for financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme?
Will his pay be refixed.?
|
An ad-hoc promotion is made only in an exigency of work
where the post cannot be kept vacant and such appointment is to be
discontinued as soon as a regular incumbent is appointed. In terms of
existing guidelines, continuation of such arrangement beyond one year is also
subject to prior concurrence of DoP&T. Thus such an employee can be
reverted to the original regular post at any moment. Therefore, case of an
employee holding the higher promotional grade/any other post on ad-hoc basis,
for grant of financial upgradation under ACPS cannot be ignored. Upon being
recommended for grant of
|
Source: 90paise.blogspot.in
No comments:
Post a Comment