MACP ON PROMITIONAL HIERARCHY
Case
No 21803/2014
Judgement on MACP on promotional hierarchy has been pronounced today. As per the judgement, the matter is relegated to Joint
Committee for settlement of anomalies, being an expert body. A list of
anomalies is given in the judgement for resolving by the Joint Committee. According
to information, no time frame fixed by the court for resolving the issues.
Friends, getting MACP on promotional hierarchy is the genuine right of lakhs of affected Central Government Employees. Various high courts
delivered judgement in our favour because it is a genuine case. And, both National Anomaly Committee and Hon’ble Supreme Court admitted it a case of anomaly. And
yet a favorable decision has not come out at this stage.
(TKR Pillai)
Convener,
Steering Committee for
MACP on Promotional hierarchy
MACP on promotional hierarchy favorable decision or not. Please clear.....
ReplyDeleteIt is referred back to anomaly committee. No favourable order. In India, you can not expect justice from Courts. SC is also working as subordinate office the government. SC took 6 years to decide that it is incompetent to decide on
ReplyDeletethe matter.
SC 06 years and anomaly committee taken time 12 years. service end. this is india.
DeleteWe have no expectation from anomaly committee. Dear Pillai Ji, your honest purpose is in now end in vein.
ReplyDeleteIf the Supreme Court is not providing final judgement then petitioner should go to the International Court for justice !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteyes
DeleteIn my opinion, the employees may be given an option either to Opt MACP or ACP in the entire service. The option exercised will be final. The conditions stipulated for MACP or ACP may be followed . If an employee has been extended three MACPs/upgradations and opted to switch over to ACP , let him permit. He has to work out financial benefits before exercising option.
ReplyDeleteAnomoly Committee wants to give option to Departments or Ministries for ACP or MACP. No option for individuals. Straightway, case is dismissed. No hope of getting any relief from the Govt and DOPT, because babus of the CSS / CSSS cadre are getting Non Functional Upgradation in the cadre of UDCs and SOs. It makes no difference to them. JCM is consisting of these people and they their own interests. Other cadres have no representation in JCM. Even other cadre issues are not taken up in Anomoly Committee meetings. Nothing is going to happen in Joint Committee meetings. Once joint committee rejects the claim, you donot have any option to go to courts as expert committee is decided.
DeleteThis is trick played by SC. They are not competent to decide. Anomoly Committee will not accept and claim is rejected. When a expert committee like Anomaly committee rejects, then SC will say as it is rejected by expert committee, we will not entertain any future litigations. That all. Ultimately, you will get babaji ka thullu.
ReplyDeleteWhat is this ? After every pay commission Anomaly Committee is constituted.The employee approached the Highest Court becoz they had seen nothing was done by Anomaly Committee. What kind of a decision is this.?
ReplyDeleteThey have done injustice to Gp C Central Govt clerical staff.
DeleteMach fix Govt. & SC
ReplyDeleteSheer bad luck. It clearly shows ministries/govt dominates even Supreme court.
ReplyDeleteGreat Injustice by the Highest Court
ReplyDeleteI have read full judgement, we have lost the Battle. Reasons given in judgement cannot satisfied the my conscious mind. Sorry for all, and thanks to all who have done efforts for our cause.
ReplyDeleteCourt is there to do justice and not there to talk about weight on exchequer. In our CASE court has not it's done duty of justice but performed duty of finance ministry.
ReplyDeleteWhy not go for review petition. Let's rethink and can have talk with Lawyers.
SC took 6 years and no result or solution of the problem. This indicates so many things about functioning of sc. Lower category are always exploited in the society in india India and this is happening in this govt.
ReplyDeleteWastage of Money Time and hope we will not get anything best time to fight was before implementation of pay commission that was passed and our leader rely or in dream that hierarchy means promotional hierarchy and at last got in grade pay its total failure of leadership
ReplyDeleteCheating of all Group C Employees and Group B to some extent. The result does not effect Group A Officers, so the news is a Happy News for them only. We should fight with nail and teeth to get JUSTICE.
ReplyDeleteWhere is leaders who gave us assurance that it will going in our favour? Shame on them if some respect in them plan a massive strike only on single issue MACP on promotional hierarchy but what they will do they will took other issue and might be happy if some get through what about us we eagerly waiting for MACP on promotional hierarchy
ReplyDeleteYes
DeleteThis is clear injustice to Group C staff of all ministries by Hon'ble Supreme Court, instead of giving judgement on MACP SC is pretending like Ministry of Finance. Now we dont have any trust on our judicial system.
ReplyDeleteWith due respect to the decision of Apex Court. I would like to submit that merely saying that it's a policy matter Court cannot do injustice to many of us who are being deprived from our legitimate right of pay. The GP from 1800 to 2000 have terribly affected by this MACP Scheme. What is the out come in the vertict nothing we are at the same stage from where the fight had begun. If a dharna place can be given attention by the Hon'ble court appointing arbitrators to negotiate sensing the interests of people protesting then I thought this MACP cas has enough substance to expect courts direction to the Anomaly committee to dispose off the issue in certain time frame or to come up with a solution that will be accepted to all. It goes without saying that this policy has a deep impact on those people where there is stagnancy in promotion. We must file a review petetion demanding a clear direction to the Anomaly Committee.
ReplyDeleteUNFORTUNATE !
ReplyDeleteSteering Committee must initiate befitting step to get justice. Either file a review petition or approach higher bench as justice is delivered on the hard facts rather misinterpreted.
It's unfortunate that the genuine and bonafide issue of common employees of the central government is not found fit to be considered by Hon'ble court.
ReplyDeleteWe can laugh or cry don't know. But certainly say that justice is not done.
The Steering Committee may take appropriate lawful actions at the earliest so that suffering employees get justice as early as possible.
ReplyDelete
sanjibMarch 11, 2020 at 6:19 AM
Please refer to point nos. 50-52 of the judgement. It is clear that Hon'ble court have pronounced against its on orders i.e. "Equal Pay for Equal Work" and other judgements which said the Junior can't be paid more than the seniors etc. Due to this MACP same doctrine of Equal Pay for Equal Work and other are not honoured. I had quoted the case of the National Museum, Ministry of Culture Government of India. It seems that was not placed on record despite our request before the court. The case of the National Museum Assistant Curators are glaring example and similar could be available in other ministers & departments. Hon'ble court said that nothing is placed before them that MACP is having error.
Dear leaders of this case please appeal against this judgement as fast as possible and ask the support of suffering employees and engage the advocate of repute.
Can we again approach the Supreme Court for a review of the decision of the Bench by filing a Review Petition? Let a Higher Bench consider the case again and give its decision as the earlier decision is totally against the Poor Group C Employees.
ReplyDeleteThat's the only option left.
DeleteThanks for sharing the post For sucessful GATE Result always prefer the best GATE Coaching along with their best Gate online coaching
ReplyDelete